Tucker: Stop-and-frisk isn’t racist, it saved lives


>>Tucker: EVER SINCE HE>>Tucker: EVER SINCE HE
BEGAN HIS EFFORT TO BUY THE BEGAN HIS EFFORT TO BUY THE
DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION, DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION,
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG HAS BEEN MICHAEL BLOOMBERG HAS BEEN
ATTACKED BY ALL SIDES FOR ATTACKED BY ALL SIDES FOR
THE STOP AND FRISK POLICIES THE STOP AND FRISK POLICIES
HE USED FOR 12 YEARS AS HE USED FOR 12 YEARS AS
MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY. MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY.
UNDER THOSE POLICIES, POLICE UNDER THOSE POLICIES, POLICE
WERE ENCOURAGED TO STOP AND WERE ENCOURAGED TO STOP AND
QUESTION INDIVIDUALS ON THE QUESTION INDIVIDUALS ON THE
STREETS OF NEW YORK AND THEN STREETS OF NEW YORK AND THEN
FRISK THEM IF THEY SUSPECTED FRISK THEM IF THEY SUSPECTED
THEM OF COMMITTING CRIMINAL THEM OF COMMITTING CRIMINAL
ACTIVITY. ACTIVITY.
BLOOMBERG HIMSELF HAS BLOOMBERG HIMSELF HAS
APOLOGIZED FOR ALL OF THIS. APOLOGIZED FOR ALL OF THIS.
HE SAYS HE IS EMBARRASSED BY HE SAYS HE IS EMBARRASSED BY
THE EXISTENCE OF THE POLICY. THE EXISTENCE OF THE POLICY.
THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND ITS THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND ITS
MANY SURROGATES HAVE JOINED MANY SURROGATES HAVE JOINED
HIM IN THAT THEY HAVE HIM IN THAT THEY HAVE
PARTNERED WITH THE LEFT TO PARTNERED WITH THE LEFT TO
CALL BLOOMBERG A RACIST FOR CALL BLOOMBERG A RACIST FOR
STOP AND FRISK. STOP AND FRISK.
THAT’S STAWNDABLE, OF THAT’S STAWNDABLE, OF
COURSE, IT’S ELECTION SEASON COURSE, IT’S ELECTION SEASON
AND EVERY POLITICIAN AND AND EVERY POLITICIAN AND
CAMPAIGN KNOW IT’S USEFUL TO CAMPAIGN KNOW IT’S USEFUL TO
ATTACK AN OPPONENT WHERE IS ATTACK AN OPPONENT WHERE IS
HE VULNERABLE. HE VULNERABLE.
BUT LET’S TAKE THREE STEPS BUT LET’S TAKE THREE STEPS
BACK. BACK.
POLITICS ASIDE, THE ONLY POLITICS ASIDE, THE ONLY
PROBLEM BLOOMBERG HAS WITH PROBLEM BLOOMBERG HAS WITH
STOP AND FRISK IS THAT HE IS STOP AND FRISK IS THAT HE IS
APOLOGIZING FOR IT. APOLOGIZING FOR IT.
STOP AND FRISK ISN’T RACIST. STOP AND FRISK ISN’T RACIST.
EVEN AS CRIME FELL IN THE EVEN AS CRIME FELL IN THE
CITY THE MOST DANGEROUS PART CITY THE MOST DANGEROUS PART
OF NEW YORK YOUNG MEN MANY OF NEW YORK YOUNG MEN MANY
GANG MEMBERS CARRYING GUNS. GANG MEMBERS CARRYING GUNS.
STOP AND FRIIVELG FOUND STOP AND FRIIVELG FOUND
THOSE GUNS BY THE THOUSANDS THOSE GUNS BY THE THOUSANDS
WHILE GANG MEMBERS LEARNED WHILE GANG MEMBERS LEARNED
TO LEAVE THEIR ILLEGAL TO LEAVE THEIR ILLEGAL
WEAPONS AT HOME IF THEY WEAPONS AT HOME IF THEY
DIDN’T WANT TO GO TO JAIL. DIDN’T WANT TO GO TO JAIL.
FOUND ILLEGAL DRUGS AS WELL FOUND ILLEGAL DRUGS AS WELL
AS TOOK THEM AND THEIR AS TOOK THEM AND THEIR
DEALERS OFF THE STREET DID. DEALERS OFF THE STREET DID.
MOST SEARCHES DISCOVER A MOST SEARCHES DISCOVER A
CRIME NO THEY DIDN’T. CRIME NO THEY DIDN’T.
12% OF ALL STOP AND FRISK 12% OF ALL STOP AND FRISK
SEVERANCE THE FRISK PART DID SEVERANCE THE FRISK PART DID
DISCOVER A CRIME. DISCOVER A CRIME.
THAT’S REMARKABLE NUMBER FOR THAT’S REMARKABLE NUMBER FOR
OTHERWISE HARMLESS SEARCH. OTHERWISE HARMLESS SEARCH.
IMAGINE IN ALL 12% OF ALL IMAGINE IN ALL 12% OF ALL
TSA SEARCHES DISCOVERED A TSA SEARCHES DISCOVERED A
GUN OR BOMB OR OTHER GUN OR BOMB OR OTHER
CRIMINAL BEHAVIORS. CRIMINAL BEHAVIORS.
WOULD YOU WANT TSA ABOLISHED WOULD YOU WANT TSA ABOLISHED
ASWASTEFUL AND EXCESSIVE NO, ASWASTEFUL AND EXCESSIVE NO,
IT’S A HUGE SUCCESS. IT’S A HUGE SUCCESS.
UNLIKE AL SHARPTON AND THE UNLIKE AL SHARPTON AND THE
BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT
OF THE NEW BAIL LAW IN NEW OF THE NEW BAIL LAW IN NEW
YORK OR THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE YORK OR THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE
REFORM BILL WE ARE ALL REFORM BILL WE ARE ALL
SUPPOSED TO LIKE, STOP AND SUPPOSED TO LIKE, STOP AND
FRISK ACTUALLY SAVED LIVES, FRISK ACTUALLY SAVED LIVES,
HUNDREDS OF LIVES, THOSE HUNDREDS OF LIVES, THOSE
LIVES ARE OVERWHELMINGLY LIVES ARE OVERWHELMINGLY
YOUNG BLACK AND HISPANIC YOUNG BLACK AND HISPANIC
PEOPLE. PEOPLE.
IN 1990, NEW YORK CITY HAD IN 1990, NEW YORK CITY HAD
MORE THAN 2,200 MURDERS. MORE THAN 2,200 MURDERS.
THAT’S A LOT. THAT’S A LOT.
THE YEAR RUDY GIULIANI LEFT THE YEAR RUDY GIULIANI LEFT
OFFICE, THERE WERE 649 OFFICE, THERE WERE 649
MURDERS. MURDERS.
UNDER MAYOR MICHAEL UNDER MAYOR MICHAEL
BLOOMBERG THAT NUMBER WAS BLOOMBERG THAT NUMBER WAS
CUT IN HALF AGAIN. CUT IN HALF AGAIN.
IT DROPPED TO 322 MURDERS. IT DROPPED TO 322 MURDERS.
A YEAR IN A CITY OF A YEAR IN A CITY OF
8 MILLION. 8 MILLION.
SO NEW YORK WASN’T JUST SO NEW YORK WASN’T JUST
SAFER, IT WAS THE SINGLE SAFER, IT WAS THE SINGLE
SAFEST MAJOR CITY IN SAFEST MAJOR CITY IN
AMERICA. AMERICA.
MAYBE IN THE WORLD OUTSIDE MAYBE IN THE WORLD OUTSIDE
TOKYO. TOKYO.
AND DO YOU KNOW WHO AGREED AND DO YOU KNOW WHO AGREED
WITH THAT? WITH THAT?
DONALD TRUMP. DONALD TRUMP.
JUST FOUR YEARS AGO IN A JUST FOUR YEARS AGO IN A
DEBATE WITH HILLARY CLINTON, DEBATE WITH HILLARY CLINTON,
THEN CANDIDATE TRUMP SAID THEN CANDIDATE TRUMP SAID
THIS: IN NEW YORK CITY STOP THIS: IN NEW YORK CITY STOP
AND FRISK, WE HAD 2,200 AND FRISK, WE HAD 2,200
MURDERS AND STOP AND FRISK MURDERS AND STOP AND FRISK
BROUGHT IT DOWN TO 500 BROUGHT IT DOWN TO 500
MURDERS. MURDERS.
500 MURDERS IS A LOT OF 500 MURDERS IS A LOT OF
MURDERS. MURDERS.
HARD TO BELIEVE. HARD TO BELIEVE.
500 IS LIKE SUPPOSED TO BE 500 IS LIKE SUPPOSED TO BE
GOOD. GOOD.
BUT WE WENT FROM 2200 TO BUT WE WENT FROM 2200 TO
500. 500.
AND IT WAS CONTINUED ON BY AND IT WAS CONTINUED ON BY
MAYOR BLOOMBERG AND IT WAS MAYOR BLOOMBERG AND IT WAS
TERMINATED BY CURRENT MAYOR. TERMINATED BY CURRENT MAYOR.
BUT STOP AND FRISK HAD A BUT STOP AND FRISK HAD A
TREMENDOUS IMPACT ON THE TREMENDOUS IMPACT ON THE
SAFETY OF NEW YORK CITY, SAFETY OF NEW YORK CITY,
TREMENDOUS BEYOND BELIEF. TREMENDOUS BEYOND BELIEF.
SO WHEN YOU SAY IT HAS NO SO WHEN YOU SAY IT HAS NO
IMPACT, IT REALLY DID. IMPACT, IT REALLY DID.
IT HAD A VERY, VERY BIG IT HAD A VERY, VERY BIG
IMPACT. IMPACT.
>>Tucker: IT’S SO FUNNY>>Tucker: IT’S SO FUNNY
BECAUSE THE ESSENCE OF STOP BECAUSE THE ESSENCE OF STOP
AND FRISK WAS TAKING ILLEGAL AND FRISK WAS TAKING ILLEGAL
GUNS OFF THE STREET GUNS OFF THE STREET
SOMETHING DEMOCRATS SAY THEY SOMETHING DEMOCRATS SAY THEY
ARE FOR. ARE FOR.
NOW THEY JUST WANT TO TAKE NOW THEY JUST WANT TO TAKE
YOUR GUNS OUT OF YOUR CLOSET YOUR GUNS OUT OF YOUR CLOSET
BECAUSE YOU DIDN’T VOTE FOR BECAUSE YOU DIDN’T VOTE FOR
THEM. THEM.
IN TRUMP’S REPUBLICAN IN TRUMP’S REPUBLICAN
CONVENTION SPEECH LATER IN CONVENTION SPEECH LATER IN
2016 HE LAID OUT THE 2016 HE LAID OUT THE
CONSEQUENCES OF ROLLING BACK CONSEQUENCES OF ROLLING BACK
EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE
POLICIES LIKE STOP AND POLICIES LIKE STOP AND
FRISK. FRISK.
>>DECADES OF PROGRESS MADE>>DECADES OF PROGRESS MADE
IN BRINGING DOWN CRIME ARE IN BRINGING DOWN CRIME ARE
NOW BEING REVERSED BY THIS NOW BEING REVERSED BY THIS
ADMINISTRATION’S ROLL BACK ADMINISTRATION’S ROLL BACK
OF CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT. OF CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT.
IN THIS RACE, FOR THE WHITE IN THIS RACE, FOR THE WHITE
HOUSE, I AM THE LAW AND HOUSE, I AM THE LAW AND
ORDER CANDIDATE. ORDER CANDIDATE.
[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]
>>Tucker: MAN WAS THAT>>Tucker: MAN WAS THAT
TRUE. TRUE.
NOTHING EFFECTS THE LIVES OF NOTHING EFFECTS THE LIVES OF
NORMAL PEOPLE, PEOPLE NORMAL PEOPLE, PEOPLE
WITHOUT POWER MORE THAN HIGH WITHOUT POWER MORE THAN HIGH
CRIME RATES. CRIME RATES.
AND IF YOU HAVEN’T LIVED IT, AND IF YOU HAVEN’T LIVED IT,
SAY A PRAYER YOU NEVER HAVE SAY A PRAYER YOU NEVER HAVE
TO BECAUSE IT’S THE WORSE TO BECAUSE IT’S THE WORSE
THING YOU CAN IMAGINE. THING YOU CAN IMAGINE.
IN 2016 DONALD TRUMP IN 2016 DONALD TRUMP
UNDERSTOOD THAT HE DIDN’T UNDERSTOOD THAT HE DIDN’T
CARE ABOUT SNEERING ELITES CARE ABOUT SNEERING ELITES
IN GATED COMMUNITIES CALLING IN GATED COMMUNITIES CALLING
THEM RACIST. THEM RACIST.
HE STOOD BEHIND LAW AND HE STOOD BEHIND LAW AND
ORDER POLICIES THAT STOOD ORDER POLICIES THAT STOOD
EVERYONE ALL BACKGROUND EVERYONE ALL BACKGROUND
ETHNICITIES AND COLORS AND ETHNICITIES AND COLORS AND
IT WORKED. IT WORKED.
TRUMP DID BETTER WITH MITT TRUMP DID BETTER WITH MITT
ROMNEY DID WITH BLACK AND ROMNEY DID WITH BLACK AND
HISPANIC VOTERS. HISPANIC VOTERS.
THAT’S PART OF THE REASON. THAT’S PART OF THE REASON.
THAT COULD HAPPEN AGAIN, BY THAT COULD HAPPEN AGAIN, BY
THE WAY. THE WAY.
BLOOMBERG IS ON APOLOGY TOUR BLOOMBERG IS ON APOLOGY TOUR
BECAUSE HE THINKS HE HAS TO BECAUSE HE THINKS HE HAS TO
SAY IT BECAUSE HE WANTS TO SAY IT BECAUSE HE WANTS TO
WIN NONWHITE VOTERS. WIN NONWHITE VOTERS.
APPARENTLY HE HASN’T LOOKED APPARENTLY HE HASN’T LOOKED
AT THE REAL NUMBERS. AT THE REAL NUMBERS.
DATA FOR PROGRESS POLLED DATA FOR PROGRESS POLLED
DEMOCRATIC VOTERS ABOUT DEMOCRATIC VOTERS ABOUT
THEIR FEELINGS ON MIKE THEIR FEELINGS ON MIKE
BLOOMBERG. BLOOMBERG.
WHEN THEY BROUGHT UP THE WHEN THEY BROUGHT UP THE
QUESTION OF STOP AND FRISK, QUESTION OF STOP AND FRISK,
THE ONLY GROUP THAT DIDN’T THE ONLY GROUP THAT DIDN’T
LIKE IT WAS WHITE DEMOCRATS. LIKE IT WAS WHITE DEMOCRATS.
BLACK DEMOCRATS FELT THE BLACK DEMOCRATS FELT THE
SAME ABOUT BLOOMBERG. SAME ABOUT BLOOMBERG.
HISPANIC AND ASIAN DEMOCRATS HISPANIC AND ASIAN DEMOCRATS
SAID THEY WERE MORE LIKELY SAID THEY WERE MORE LIKELY
TO VOTE FOR MIKE BLOOMBERG TO VOTE FOR MIKE BLOOMBERG
AFTER HEARING ABOUT STOP AND AFTER HEARING ABOUT STOP AND
FRISK. FRISK.
IT’S SURPRISING. IT’S SURPRISING.
NOBODY IN AMERICA OF ALL NOBODY IN AMERICA OF ALL
RACES LIKE CRIME. RACES LIKE CRIME.
EVERYONE WANTS TO LESSEN IT. EVERYONE WANTS TO LESSEN IT.
ONLY PEOPLE WHO FEEL ONLY PEOPLE WHO FEEL
DIFFERENTLY ARE WHITE DIFFERENTLY ARE WHITE
LIBERALS. LIBERALS.
WHY ARE THEY BOSSING US WHY ARE THEY BOSSING US
AROUND? AROUND?
WE SHOULDN’T LET THEM. WE SHOULDN’T LET THEM.
FOR SOME REASON THE FOR SOME REASON THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY IS LETTING REPUBLICAN PARTY IS LETTING
THEM DO THAT ACHE SAID STOP THEM DO THAT ACHE SAID STOP
AND FRISK TO THE LEFT. AND FRISK TO THE LEFT.
WHERE IS THIS GOING EXACTLY? WHERE IS THIS GOING EXACTLY?
FOUR YEARS NOW REPUBLICANS FOUR YEARS NOW REPUBLICANS
DENOUNCING BANS ON PUBLIC DENOUNCING BANS ON PUBLIC
DEFECATION ON DECENCY? DEFECATION ON DECENCY?
ALL DESERVE TO LIVE IN A ALL DESERVE TO LIVE IN A
SAFE CLEAN LAW ABIDING SAFE CLEAN LAW ABIDING
COUNTRY. COUNTRY.
ANY REASON TO VOTE ANY REASON TO VOTE
REPUBLICAN IS BECAUSE THEY REPUBLICAN IS BECAUSE THEY
STAND UP FOR THAT WHEN THEY

Author Since: Mar 11, 2019

  1. Yeah…..sorry. stop and frisk is unconstitutional and unfair. you can save lives doing a lot of shitty things. It kind of makes me mad he said this because I usually like what he says…..

  2. Stop and Frisk in principle is OK. It was targeting it at poor people and people of color. What would we find if stopped white people in suits and frisked them too? Hmmm…

  3. Tucker: Stop-and-frisk isn't racist if those people are committing all the crimes. And they are. Carry on.

  4. Im not for or against stop and frisk. Think about this, your driving along in your car doing nothing wrong, and then your pulled over for some suspicion. Next thing you know there searching your pockets and your car… Hmmmm..

  5. Think about how stupid the average politician is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!

  6. Why don't they stop and frisk all the white brokers in Wall Street? Guarantee you 100% of the time they will all have cocaine on themselves

  7. It was racist as applied, and therefore un-Constitutional. Shame on you, Tucker, for expressing approval of stop and frisk.

  8. If it sounds like, looks like, and has it's pants around it's ankles like a criminal, then probably is a criminal

  9. Big Tucker and Trump fan here. Perhaps it's easy for me living in a relatively safe part of the country, but I have issues with stop and frisk and it's not for the reasons the Democrats are citing. It's because there's a fundamental violation of our 4th amendment rights taking place. If this is allowed in practice, then the same principles of bypassing our privacy rights can be exploited in a thousand other ways with this precedent. My opinion is that Trump was wrong in 2016. And I'm surprised Tucker being a libertarian is ok with this policy. I get he benefited from a safer NYC, but surely he appreciates the principle of concern here.

  10. So no DUE PROCESS TUCK .. HOW ABOUT YOUR NEIGHBOR MAYBE YOUR GIRLS AS WALK TO SCHOOL… NA NA TUCK DO PROCESS ONLY APPLIES IN POOR NEIGHBORHOODS

  11. The point is Biden is on Bernie's bumper and getting ready to pass him. Trump Biden 2020 your heard it here on Tuckers comment section first.

  12. The shitty city has gotten worse since they did away with stop and frisk!! Facts are facts. Look up crime stats and it will speak for itself!!

  13. Ray Kelley (NY Commish.)examines stopnfrisk exhaustively; SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR: "young black man trys five cardoor handles=robbery" vs. "old white man trys five cardoorhandles=senior moment"

  14. TSA inspections are a whole different situation than stop & frisk RANDOM searches on a city street. Bloomberg is FOS & pandering for minority votes. Sick OF you Zionist LIARS. WHO was targeted, RACIST?

  15. Maybe not racist, but definitely unconstitutional. I'm not inclined to surrender our liberties under the guise of safety.

  16. Democrats are for gun control but also against racism.
    Their brains start hurting when they find out which race is using guns to commit crime.

  17. How many responses are made here that have no concern for the English language and present themselves as "informed"? Most responses I tried to read were so incoherent that whatever point they were attempting was lost due to the English language being lost to "a movement" to obstruct a Nation where the English language is primary.

  18. Whether it saved lives or not, the way it was enforced was racist and blatantly unconstitutional. The ends do not justify the means.

  19. NOOOOOOOO…tucker is a fool for trying to demolish our liberty. Police have NO right without warrant to search you. The supreme court has eroded these god given rights over time. Dogs can search your car. They can search your cell phone. They can take your blood by force. NO. Shoot any police who try to deny your freedom from search without warrant. But let's search Tuckers person, computers and home FIRST. He'd be ok with that, he had nothing to hide, right?

  20. Hello. Regarding Stop, Question and Frisk. Thanks to New York STATE Criminal Procedure Law – CPL § 140.50 Temporary questioning of persons in public places; search for weapons, aka Stop, Question & Frisk rule, I identified and arrested dozens of emotionally troubled, light or heavily armed teen and adult citizens primarily responsible for traumatizing an entire Brooklyn, NY community.

    The same violence-torn Brooklyn community where Childhood Trauma (ACEs) victims Shawn Carter and the late Gun Violence Homicide victim Christopher Wallace were raised, nurtured and socialized.

    In fact it was the fear of violence, growing concerns for my personal safety, as well as my emotional well-being that caused me to request a transfer to a less life threatening, more stable work environment where I would not being interacting with emotionally troubled fellow citizens on a daily basis.

    Essentially, BURN-OUT caused me to abandon a community I served for near-twelve years, a community where my grandmother once lived.

    I can only begin to imagine the emotional stresses experienced by people residing in communities where violence rules most days, and the heart thumping sounds of gun shots are heard echoing thru residential neighborhoods at any time of day or night.

    Unfortunately, young kids like Shawn, the late Christopher Wallace, the late Freddie Gray, the late Tupac Shakur, the late Michael Brown, the late Eric Garner, the late Laquan McDonald, the late Stephon Clark, as well as untold numbers of abused, neglected and/or maltreated children and teens do not have the option of packing up their belongings and moving to another community when they believe their minds are being affected in ways that is not healthy for them.

    If society wishes to reduce the number of people detained by police, we MUST first ask one important question, "Why are perfectly healthy newborns maturing into emotionally troubled, depressed, angry, frustrated, sometimes violent teen and adult citizens largely lacking empathy, compassion and respect for their peaceful, as well as less fortunate neighbors!"

    "A little kid shoots @ woman with a 9mm because…"

    /watch?v=VPicjKGhfjE/

    Peace.

  21. If it’ targets the problem and reduces crime , something is being done right , why sugar coat the truth ?

  22. This violates right to privacy and gives police way too much power. The constitution says a crime must be committed BEFORE a search, guided by testimony. Stop and frisk is communism.

  23. The high crimes neighborhoods are poor or low income communities that are predominantly black. So this is why it’s viewed as racist, because the money spent on more police and more jailed, could be spent on creating opportunities for the community and changing the whole dynamic of such community.
    If we aren’t doing that and only doing stop and frisk we are not honoring our right of freedom here in the USA. Let’s spend the money on helping instead of stop and frisk. Our old way of doing aren’t helping those become better people and citizens but just filling jails and children without parents, and the hamster wheel keeps spinning. Time to take a different approach

  24. It’s amazing how conservatives have a strict interpretation of the Constitution until it comes to affording Black people their due process…

  25. Supreme Court has made it clear there are 4th amendment protections. While I hate gang members as much as frikkin Nazis, how many stopped and frisked had done nothing wrong? I never agreed with this policy and no Constitution loving American should.

  26. Unless the cop is racist then stop and frisk is not racist. You get frisked because you look sketchy and you're in a bad area cops aren't dumb. If you aren't up to something you shouldn't be in those situations to get stopped. I agree a lot of cops enforced it racially but the LAW on paper is not racist or unconstitutional

  27. Who cares if u get stopped and frisked. If your doing nothing wrong whats the problem? It keeps alot of people safe. They can stop and frisk me all they want. It seems to me the only people who gives a dam about that is the people who have something to hide.( STOP AND FRISK IS NOT RACIST!) If i lived in a terrible area of town where the crime was terrible, do u think i would give a dam how many people got frisked if crime went way down? NO!

  28. Crime is mostly ethic. This policy was put in place as a last ditch effort because they don't know what else to do.

  29. Tbh ppl who wasnt outside during stop n frisk should not be commenting on how “great” it was nor should you be qualified to do so. Stop n frisk was a thugs worst enemy and a “civilians” worst nightmare.

  30. I'll give you absolute safety in a crime-free society. Just forfeit all your freedoms and rights. That's essentially what Carlson's argument is. How stupid. As much as I agree with this guy normally, this is the dumbest thing that has ever come out of his mouth. Shame on him for being as idiotic as a leftist twit

  31. the argument "it saves lives" can be made to justify ANY overreach from the government into our lives. That's not enough, but in this case I'm not even sure if it's true. Gun crime was dropping for well over a decade in NYC and throughout the country before stop and frisk. We know that violent crime correlates directly with the gini coefficient. Strong arm police tactics likely make it worse, not better.

  32. Outside the US but important nonetheless:
    I saw in the news that the police planted drugs after stop and frisk action on a lone driver on the road. What saved him was the doorman of a building that recorded it; according to him a similar situation had happened to a relative.
    Not even the driver's family believed him and the police officers said in their defense that they thought he was a car stealer.

  33. I like Tucker a lot but he’s wrong here. While there’s some correlation between lower crime rates and stop-and-frisk, there isn’t clear causation to indicate it directly and significantly affected crime rates. What it did do was completely ruin the relationship between police and citizens by making even the law-abiding citizens wary of all LEOs.

  34. You are way off the mark on this, for a conservative you're pretty quick to throw the 4th amendment out the window.

  35. Trump is probably going to go against Biden in a mighty battle. Trump is off course a great president and Biden is…not. STILL, remember – you should be aware of that there is L A R G E percentage group in USA that HATE Trump! Remember that Clinton got more votes than Trump last time, (but lost in electorial votes.) Trump may have become stronger…but the demcrats are many!…..2016 not all democrats went to vote…because they thought that they did not need to (the democrats would still win). BUT now they knew what happened – they will empty their neighbourhoods of democrats to go and vote for anyone BUT Trump! SO WAKE UP – YOU REALLY MUST VOTE IN NOVEMBER!

  36. It was not a good policy and it should not be implemented again, but you can't deny that it worked to stop crime. Criticisms of it should be based on Constitutional grounds.

  37. First time i have disagreed with Tucker. No one should be stopped and searched without probable cause. Its in the constitution.

  38. I don't care how many crimes it stopped. Giving police the authority to stop you when you're doing nothing wrong, then proceed to frisk you, shouldn't be taking place, period. That opens the door for terrible things..

  39. Tucker, can you (or someone else) direct me to the primary statistics used for this segment? I want to enlighten one of my lefty friends on this but they won't believe me if I tell them it was from Fox.

  40. Liberty before life. If we randomly searched every American household we could find a crime in 12 percent of searches there as well.

  41. But it's Unconstitutional and the Supreme Court ruled that it was. shouldn't "small government Republicans" be up in arms about this? or doesn't happen to me so who cares?

  42. Regardless of whether or not it was racist, stop and frisk violated American citizen’s fourth amendment right in the name of “taking illegal guns off the streets”. Plus, even at the peak of the NYPD stops — there was a record 685,724 in 2011 — cops seized 819 guns. That's a gun recovered in just 0.1% of the stops. More than half a million people were searched in a single year in NYC.

  43. The best thing about stop and frisk is the many black people in private jail working for 23 cents per hour to keep the american economy going

  44. The problem with stop and frisk is you can justify doing it to anyone and every one. There is nothing wrong with the current system. If a cop can articulate reasonable suspicion, I'm all for the stopping and detaining a person and frisking them. Because it shows a reason for the action. But to do it to everyone with essentially no level of reasoning is a dangerous game

  45. Some neighborhoods, in every part of the country are being terrorized by gangs. Though i think stop and frisk is messed up its only logic that for those bad neighborhoods that the policy would actually work. I'm not saying a specific race of a neighborhood because there's gangs of all ethnicities all over the place. In those areas that policy would actually save lives.

  46. It’s so funny. Bc if you look around the country crime was dropping everywhere at the time. Even in cities that didn’t impose stop and frisk.

  47. Problem with stop and frisk is it violates the constitution- you cant stop without probable cause. Tucker you should know this.

  48. It doesn’t matter if it’s effective, it’s unconstitutional. End of story when you are talking about running a U.S. city.

  49. It saved lives but tramples over your rights and facilitates the possibility for racial discrimination and broad over stepping police, and shifts the balance of law to assum guilt until proven other wise . Poor arguement Tucker, very poor. Something different could easily have been done. I support some of trumps ideas but this isnt one, freedom over security.

  50. In a way, I agree with the leftists. White people do have white privilege. Hear me out…

    Imagine starting a small family business, the kind that takes generations to grow. You intend to sell to your own (racial) community at first providing quality goods at a low price specific to the needs of your group. Your business would usually raise the station of your family, create jobs, provide taxes, and fill the community with products.
    Now, imagine that we’ll intended enterprise being looted by children, riddled with stray bullets, and gang violence that require the presence of the national guard occurring in front of your store until upstanding people no longer want to shop there forcing you to close permanently. It is this regard, white have more privilege. AT LEAST y’all get to call the police and/or sue vagrants of your race without ostracism.

    I mean seriously, how many vets other than whites go back to their own communities after their service to the country? I know vets from Chicago and Miami that go buy land in New Hampshire or Montana to get away the neighborhood fuckery. Smh

    I’m sure white folks have their problems like opioid epidemic but flagrancy and vagrants get dealt with quickly and harshly.

    Start stop and frisk in south side Chicago on Monday, they’ll be a quick war of no consequence by the weekend, and real estate will double by the following close of the NASDQ on Tuesday. It’s a no brainer!

  51. We could probably get crime down to 0 if we put tracking bracelets on everyone's ankles and cameras in everyones homes. Why dont you advocate for that?

  52. They reject God and family so the devil steps in and takes control, in this case via government. Because they're so close together they're easily controlled like animals. What do you expect?

    Isaiah 5:8  Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no place, that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth!

    Isaiah 5:9  In mine ears said the LORD of hosts, Of a truth many houses shall be desolate, even great and fair, without inhabitant

    Seen Detroit lately? The Democrat Party has been nothing but destruction on this nation since its founding and it's only going to continue to be.

  53. It is predjudiced because we have leaked audio of Bloomberg saying so…..I find it funny that tucker can justify stop and frisk…if white people were getting stopped and frisked it would be an issue. NYC gun violence went down because they got rid of the second amendment 😆 had nothing to do with stop and frisk.

  54. How’re you going to call yourself a CONSERVATIVE when you don’t believe in CONSERVING our constitutional rights. Being conservative doesn’t mean supporting everything the democrats do except you like tax cuts. It means conserving our constitution, our Christian values and our heritage. This is one example of an unconstitutional policy and if you support it sorry you’re not a conservative.

  55. So Tucker is a statist. Okay then. I hope they put a cop outside his house to frisk him every time he leaves the house.

Related Post