Trump Defends Kavanaugh As 2020 Democrats Call For His Removal | NBC Nightly News


ALLEGATION WAS NOT INVESTIGATED. NOW SOME DEMOCRATS ARE CALLING NOW SOME DEMOCRATS ARE CALLING FOR HIM TO BE IMPEACHED. FOR HIM TO BE IMPEACHED. KELLY O’DONNELL HAS MORE. KELLY O’DONNELL HAS MORE.>>Reporter: TONIGHT A DIVISIVE>>Reporter: TONIGHT A DIVISIVE POLITICAL FIRE REIGNITED AROUND POLITICAL FIRE REIGNITED AROUND SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BRETT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BRETT KAVANAUGH SURROUNDING KAVANAUGH SURROUNDING ALLEGATIONS THAT HE DENIES A ALLEGATIONS THAT HE DENIES A DRUNKING SEXUAL MISCONDUCT IN DRUNKING SEXUAL MISCONDUCT IN THE ’80s. THE ’80s.>>I NEVER SEXUALLY ASSAULTED>>I NEVER SEXUALLY ASSAULTED ANYONE, NOT IN HIGH SCHOOL, NOT ANYONE, NOT IN HIGH SCHOOL, NOT IN COLLEGE, NOT EVER. IN COLLEGE, NOT EVER. SEXUAL ASSAULT IS HORRIFIC. SEXUAL ASSAULT IS HORRIFIC.>>Reporter: A NEW BOOK OUT>>Reporter: A NEW BOOK OUT TUESDAY EXAMINES PAST TUESDAY EXAMINES PAST ACCUSATIONS AGAINST KAVANAUGH, ACCUSATIONS AGAINST KAVANAUGH, DESCRIBING WITNESSES WHO SAY DESCRIBING WITNESSES WHO SAY THEY WERE NOT INTERVIEWED BY THE THEY WERE NOT INTERVIEWED BY THE FBI BEFORE KAVANAUGH’S SENATE FBI BEFORE KAVANAUGH’S SENATE CONFIRMATION. CONFIRMATION. NBC NEWS REPORTED ON CLAIMS MADE NBC NEWS REPORTED ON CLAIMS MADE BY DEBORAH RAMIREZ THAT BY DEBORAH RAMIREZ THAT KAVANAUGH EXPOSED HIMSELF. KAVANAUGH EXPOSED HIMSELF. THE AUTHORS SAY IN AN EXCLUSIVE THE AUTHORS SAY IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW TO AIR IN THE THIRD INTERVIEW TO AIR IN THE THIRD HOUR OF THE “TODAY” SHOW HOUR OF THE “TODAY” SHOW TOMORROW THAT THEY GOT FURGER TOMORROW THAT THEY GOT FURGER KWAUBERATION. KWAUBERATION.>>WE HAVE SEVEN SOURCES>>WE HAVE SEVEN SOURCES INCLUDING TWO CLASSMATES FROM INCLUDING TWO CLASSMATES FROM RAMIREZ AND KAVANAUGH’S YEAR AT RAMIREZ AND KAVANAUGH’S YEAR AT YALE WHO REMEMBERED HEARING YALE WHO REMEMBERED HEARING ABOUT THE EVENT. ABOUT THE EVENT.>>Reporter: AND A SEPARATE>>Reporter: AND A SEPARATE ALLEGATION MADE PUBLIC. ALLEGATION MADE PUBLIC. NBC NEWS CONFIRMS THE INSTANCE NBC NEWS CONFIRMS THE INSTANCE OF KAVANAUGH EXPOSING HIMSELF IN OF KAVANAUGH EXPOSING HIMSELF IN COLLEGE WHICH THE FBI DID NOT COLLEGE WHICH THE FBI DID NOT INVESTIGATE. INVESTIGATE. TODAY 2020 DEMOCRATS CALL FOR TODAY 2020 DEMOCRATS CALL FOR KAVANAUGH’S REMOVAL WITH KAVANAUGH’S REMOVAL WITH MULTIPLE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES MULTIPLE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES CALLING FOR KAVANAUGH’S CALLING FOR KAVANAUGH’S IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT.>>IMPEACHMENT IS SOMETHING YOU>>IMPEACHMENT IS SOMETHING YOU CAN LOOK AT, BUT YOU’VE GOT TO CAN LOOK AT, BUT YOU’VE GOT TO GET THE DOCUMENTS TO BE ABLE TO GET THE DOCUMENTS TO BE ABLE TO PROVE THE CASE. PROVE THE CASE.>>Reporter: PRESIDENT TRUMP>>Reporter: PRESIDENT TRUMP INVOKED JUSTICE KAVANAUGH AT INVOKED JUSTICE KAVANAUGH AT BOTH RALLIES AND TODAY DELIVERED BOTH RALLIES AND TODAY DELIVERED A FIERCE DEFENSE ON TWITTER, A FIERCE DEFENSE ON TWITTER, PROTECT KAVANAUGH. PROTECT KAVANAUGH. BRETT KAVANAUGH SHOULD START BRETT KAVANAUGH SHOULD START SUING PEOPLE FOR LIABLE. SUING PEOPLE FOR LIABLE. WHEN DOES IT STOP. WHEN DOES IT STOP. KELLY IS WITH US NOW. KELLY IS WITH US NOW. THAT ADDITIONAL ALLEGATION, WAS THAT ADDITIONAL ALLEGATION, WAS THAT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO SOME THAT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN TO SOME MEMBERS OF CONGRESS? MEMBERS OF CONGRESS?>>Reporter: IT’S OUR>>Reporter: IT’S OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT AT LEAST A UNDERSTANDING THAT AT LEAST A COUPLE OF MEMBERS OF THE COUPLE OF MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WHICH WAS JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WHICH WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMATION RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMATION WERE AWARE OF THIS ALLEGATION WERE AWARE OF THIS ALLEGATION LAST YEAR AHEAD OF CONFIRMATION. LAST YEAR AHEAD OF CONFIRMATION. AND IT IS NOW JUST BECOMING AND IT IS NOW JUST BECOMING PUBLIC SO WE ALL KNOW ABOUT IT, PUBLIC SO WE ALL KNOW ABOUT IT, BUT THEY HAD SOME KNOWLEDGE BUT THEY HAD SOME KNOWLEDGE ABOUT IT THEN. ABOUT IT THEN. THE WOMAN INVOLVED HAS NOT COME THE WOMAN INVOLVED HAS NOT COME FORWARD. FORWARD. WE ALSO REACHED OUT TODAY TO WE ALSO REACHED OUT TODAY TO JUSTICE KAVANAUGH THROUGH THE JUSTICE KAVANAUGH THROUGH THE COURT. COURT. HE DECLINED TO COMMENT. HE DECLINED TO COMMENT. AND TODAY MITCH McCONNELL AND TODAY MITCH McCONNELL TWEETED THAT HE EXPECTS TO SEE TWEETED THAT HE EXPECTS TO SEE KAVANAUGH’S SERVICE ON THE COURT

Author Since: Mar 11, 2019

  1. SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE NOW!

  2. SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE NOW!

  3. SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE SUBPOENA MARK JUDGE NOW!

  4. As a result of a "claim", Democratic presidential candidates former HUD Secretary Julián Castro, former Rep. Beto O'Rourke, and U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Kamala Harris of California called for Kavanaugh's impeachment. Now it has been revealed that the claim was *COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED*. Castro, Warren, O'Rourke and Harris all called for Kavanaugh's without any facts. *Understand how dangerous these people are .

  5. You know what ? I don’t care if he even did do that in high school or college 😆
    That’s right I said it

    .. I don’t even care aaahh hahahaha

  6. Choosing people of character who are above reproach to serve in our highest judicial system would defeat the purpose. Fish rots from the head down.

  7. These people are all monsters. Every single last one of them. Psychopathic monsters. Red and blue psychopathic monsters. Choose your monster.
    Hah hah hah hah! I voted for the red psychopathic monster and the red psychopathic monster won! I am so happy about things now. My life will be so much better now that the red psychopathic monsters are running things and the blue psychopathic monsters aren't.

  8. REMEMBER, the last VICTIM was a real winner: A College professor, Christine Ford, can’t remember the year her “assault” happened, but can remember that she was fifteen. Chances are she won’t be joining the Math Department any time soon at Palo Alto University. Does it get any worse than this?

  9. 1. It's gross what they did to Kavanaugh. He even gave his $600k in crowdfunding donations to 3 different charities(like Trump does with his salary) while Ford raked in over $1 million via GoFundMe. Not a word from the broken media.

    2. Meanwhile Cory Booker benefited from the story he told about when he sexually assaulted one of his classmates in high school. Not a word from the media. Meh, he's a black Democrat so it happens right?

    3. ALL OF THE WITNESSES Christine Blasey Ford named said it never happened. Since then another accuser, Munro, has admitted that she made up her story. She's under criminal investigation by the FBI and DOJ. Her attorney was Michael Avenatti, the hero of the Dems, lol. Not a word from the broken media about any of that.

    4. Maryland Police are still open to filing charges on Kavanaugh. They just need Ford to come in and make a statement. Still no word from Ford after 30+ years. Reportedly she's waiting for her donations to hit $2 million. Same crap media.

  10. Pfffft… the liberals are just worried because they believe Kavanaugh will try to overturn or modify Roe v. Wade. So what do they do… attack.

  11. He's gonna end up having his hands and pingas chopped off if he gets impeached. There needs to be solid evidence for that to happen though.

    😂🔪👐🍆

  12. Commiecrat Ruth Bader Ginsburg is teetering on the edge so the Commiecrats are desperate because their judicial despotism is coming to an end….that is all.
    NBC = Communist/globalist agenda propaganda, scouring the country daily for any Cultural Marxism agenda racially divisive story they can dig up or refabricate to fit their anti-American narrative.

  13. Washington Post fact-checker gives Harris four Pinocchios

    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/406023-wapost-fact-checker-gives-harris-four-pinocchios

    By Joe Concha – 09/11/18

    Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler awarded Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) four Pinocchios in a Tuesday column,

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/11/did-brett-kavanaugh-offer-dog-whistle-abortion-foes/?noredirect=on
    writing that she had selectively edited a video of Supreme Court
    nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s comments about “abortion-inducing drugs” to
    argue he is against birth control.

    Kessler wrote that in a tweet highlighting Kavanaugh’s comments, Harris did not make it clear that
    Kavanaugh was actually reiterating the plaintiff’s position in a 2013
    court case. Instead, he wrote, she made it seem that Kavanaugh was
    offering his own opinion.

    “The issue at hand is Kavanaugh’s
    reference to ‘abortion-inducing drugs,’” Kessler wrote. “A plain reading
    of his sentence, with its reference to 'they said,' suggests that he is
    merely reflecting the plaintiffs’ argument.”

    He said Harris had omitted the words “they said” in a widely circulated tweet that said
    Kavanaugh’s comments were a “dog whistle for going after birth control.”

    “Harris’s decision to snip those crucial words from her first post on the video
    is certainly troubling,” the Washington Post fact-checker wrote.

    In a second tweet sent out by Harris a day later, Harris did provide the full context of Kavanaugh’s remarks, Kessler wrote.

    “But there was no acknowledgment by Harris that the original tweet was
    misleading,” he added. “She earns Four Pinocchios — and her fellow
    Democrats should drop this talking point.”

    A four-Pinocchio rating is the most egregious one can receive from the Post fact-checker.

    In the first tweet sent out on Sept. 7 2019, Harris, a member of the Judiciary
    Committee overseeing Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, said Kavanaugh
    was nominated “for the purpose of taking away a woman’s constitutionally
    protected right to make her own health care decisions.”

    Kavanaugh chooses his words very carefully, and this is a dog whistle for going
    after birth control. He was nominated for the purpose of taking away a
    woman’s constitutionally protected right to make her own health care
    decisions. Make no mistake – this is about punishing women. pic.twitter.com/zkBjXzIvQI

    — Kamala Harris (@SenKamalaHarris) September 7, 2018

    The tweet has been “liked” more than 30,000 times and retweeted more than 15,000 times. 

    After conservatives blasted the tweet as taking Kavanaugh’s remarks out
    of context, Harris replied to her own tweet one day later by including a
    video showing the nominee's comments in full while not backing off her
    original assertion. 

    “There's no question that he uncritically
    used the term ‘abortion-inducing drugs,’ which is a dog whistle term
    used by extreme anti-choice groups to describe birth control," she wrote.

    The fact-check is the second in two days to cite Harris, with Politifact also rating her comments about Kavanaugh during last week's confirmation hearings as “false.”

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/sep/10/kamala-harris/brett-kavanaugh-birth-control-abortion-inducing/

  14. Washington Post fact-checker gives Harris four Pinocchios

    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/406023-wapost-fact-checker-gives-harris-four-pinocchios

    By Joe Concha – 09/11/18

    Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler awarded Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) four Pinocchios in a Tuesday column,

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/11/did-brett-kavanaugh-offer-dog-whistle-abortion-foes/?noredirect=on
    writing that she had selectively edited a video of Supreme Court
    nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s comments about “abortion-inducing drugs” to
    argue he is against birth control.

    Kessler wrote that in a tweet highlighting Kavanaugh’s comments, Harris did not make it clear that
    Kavanaugh was actually reiterating the plaintiff’s position in a 2013
    court case. Instead, he wrote, she made it seem that Kavanaugh was
    offering his own opinion.

    “The issue at hand is Kavanaugh’s
    reference to ‘abortion-inducing drugs,’” Kessler wrote. “A plain reading
    of his sentence, with its reference to 'they said,' suggests that he is
    merely reflecting the plaintiffs’ argument.”

    He said Harris had omitted the words “they said” in a widely circulated tweet that said
    Kavanaugh’s comments were a “dog whistle for going after birth control.”

    “Harris’s decision to snip those crucial words from her first post on the video
    is certainly troubling,” the Washington Post fact-checker wrote.

    In a second tweet sent out by Harris a day later, Harris did provide the full context of Kavanaugh’s remarks, Kessler wrote.

    “But there was no acknowledgment by Harris that the original tweet was
    misleading,” he added. “She earns Four Pinocchios — and her fellow
    Democrats should drop this talking point.”

    A four-Pinocchio rating is the most egregious one can receive from the Post fact-checker.

    In the first tweet sent out on Sept. 7 2019, Harris, a member of the Judiciary
    Committee overseeing Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, said Kavanaugh
    was nominated “for the purpose of taking away a woman’s constitutionally
    protected right to make her own health care decisions.”

    Kavanaugh chooses his words very carefully, and this is a dog whistle for going
    after birth control. He was nominated for the purpose of taking away a
    woman’s constitutionally protected right to make her own health care
    decisions. Make no mistake – this is about punishing women. pic.twitter.com/zkBjXzIvQI

    — Kamala Harris (@SenKamalaHarris) September 7, 2018

    The tweet has been “liked” more than 30,000 times and retweeted more than 15,000 times. 

    After conservatives blasted the tweet as taking Kavanaugh’s remarks out
    of context, Harris replied to her own tweet one day later by including a
    video showing the nominee's comments in full while not backing off her
    original assertion. 

    “There's no question that he uncritically
    used the term ‘abortion-inducing drugs,’ which is a dog whistle term
    used by extreme anti-choice groups to describe birth control," she wrote.

    The fact-check is the second in two days to cite Harris, with Politifact also rating her comments about Kavanaugh during last week's confirmation hearings as “false.”

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/sep/10/kamala-harris/brett-kavanaugh-birth-control-abortion-inducing/

  15. Washington Post fact-checker gives Harris four Pinocchios

    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/406023-wapost-fact-checker-gives-harris-four-pinocchios

    By Joe Concha – 09/11/18

    Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler awarded Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) four Pinocchios in a Tuesday column,

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/11/did-brett-kavanaugh-offer-dog-whistle-abortion-foes/?noredirect=on
    writing that she had selectively edited a video of Supreme Court
    nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s comments about “abortion-inducing drugs” to
    argue he is against birth control.

    Kessler wrote that in a tweet highlighting Kavanaugh’s comments, Harris did not make it clear that
    Kavanaugh was actually reiterating the plaintiff’s position in a 2013
    court case. Instead, he wrote, she made it seem that Kavanaugh was
    offering his own opinion.

    “The issue at hand is Kavanaugh’s
    reference to ‘abortion-inducing drugs,’” Kessler wrote. “A plain reading
    of his sentence, with its reference to 'they said,' suggests that he is
    merely reflecting the plaintiffs’ argument.”

    He said Harris had omitted the words “they said” in a widely circulated tweet that said
    Kavanaugh’s comments were a “dog whistle for going after birth control.”

    “Harris’s decision to snip those crucial words from her first post on the video
    is certainly troubling,” the Washington Post fact-checker wrote.

    In a second tweet sent out by Harris a day later, Harris did provide the full context of Kavanaugh’s remarks, Kessler wrote.

    “But there was no acknowledgment by Harris that the original tweet was
    misleading,” he added. “She earns Four Pinocchios — and her fellow
    Democrats should drop this talking point.”

    A four-Pinocchio rating is the most egregious one can receive from the Post fact-checker.

    In the first tweet sent out on Sept. 7 2019, Harris, a member of the Judiciary
    Committee overseeing Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, said Kavanaugh
    was nominated “for the purpose of taking away a woman’s constitutionally
    protected right to make her own health care decisions.”

    Kavanaugh chooses his words very carefully, and this is a dog whistle for going
    after birth control. He was nominated for the purpose of taking away a
    woman’s constitutionally protected right to make her own health care
    decisions. Make no mistake – this is about punishing women. pic.twitter.com/zkBjXzIvQI

    — Kamala Harris (@SenKamalaHarris) September 7, 2018

    The tweet has been “liked” more than 30,000 times and retweeted more than 15,000 times. 

    After conservatives blasted the tweet as taking Kavanaugh’s remarks out
    of context, Harris replied to her own tweet one day later by including a
    video showing the nominee's comments in full while not backing off her
    original assertion. 

    “There's no question that he uncritically
    used the term ‘abortion-inducing drugs,’ which is a dog whistle term
    used by extreme anti-choice groups to describe birth control," she wrote.

    The fact-check is the second in two days to cite Harris, with Politifact also rating her comments about Kavanaugh during last week's confirmation hearings as “false.”

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/sep/10/kamala-harris/brett-kavanaugh-birth-control-abortion-inducing/

  16. The victim don't remember anything happening,that mean it was made up. Leave this man alone this is not America. Democrats stop all this.

  17. Love it time to get those impeachment papers ready
    and this sticks it to the Republican GOP and Donald Trump i'm down for it
    good day to be a Democrat

  18. Christine ford's Own friend said she lied about any party…. if her own friends call her a liar. … not much more to say than that…

  19. Until the Fake News Media gets sued or a law enacted to stop knowing false information, nothing will change as far as false and defamatory information being published.

  20. They never have a police report but they always have a book to sell smh the fake news is out of control #Trump2020 investigate the news media they be lying to much

  21. Whether it can be proven or not. His display of conduct before Congress made it clear he does not have the demeanor nor the character to hold the position he has. We have lost the high standards and lowered the bar of what we should expect from the Judges we put in place.

  22. Lmfao lol 😂lol fake news making their supporters look even more
    Libtarded than they really are , can liberals say "like" attract "likes , (Dirt attracts Dirt ) unbelievable scary 😱

  23. This is all a fake accusation and Kavanaugh needs to take legal action. It's all rumour type nonsense and now the NYT's is walking it back as well. This has something to do with what Ford's lawyer said recently where it brought in to question whether Ford's accusations were politically motivated. I call for the removal of the Democrats Vote the quack Democrats out of office 2020 Give them a wake up call. Make them change their party's ways and ideas.

  24. Beer swilling Kavanaugh and trump SCOTUS justice patsy is chomping at the bit
    to get his grubby little hands on this Roe v Wade issue. This punk sexual pervert
    can’t wait to serve his master.

  25. This is total BS! Another hit job by the Democrats through media that’s complicit. You guys should be ashamed of yourselves for reporting this! Trying to take care of a good man because you’re losing power! Shame on you!

  26. I've read many of the comments listed below. I was surprised at how many have Kavanaugh guilty of a crime that there is no evidence of. These people are quick to throw the first stone.

  27. NBC is just another arm of the left wing propoganda machine. Pathetic and hateful. Divisive to the country, and that's how they like it.

  28. HA HA THE NEW YORK TIMES HAS RETREATED ON THIS FAKE STORY. THE DEMOCRATS ONCE AGAIN LOOK LIKE IDIOTS. THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES DON'T HAVE THE RATIONAL JUDGEMENT TO EVER BE PRESIDENT.

  29. So Kavanaugh is anti-trust?  Hope so.  That would explain the democrats desperate attempts to discredit and derail him to protect all their money laundering and slush funds through foundations, Book Sales and Hedge fund investments.  Lionel Nation is publically advising Kavanaugh to sue NYT for slander.  Time for popcorn

  30. Ultra leftwing socialist believe if they repeat a lie over and over, People will eventually start to believe it. After all it worked very well for the Nazis in WW2. It's just more leftwing  liberal propaganda. The Democrats are trying any type of Character assassination in an effort to get a conservative Judge off the Supreme Court.

  31. Kavanaugh has been groomed from early days for this position. The self-designated (oh, wait, I think they claim that God chose them) 'powers that be' helped him every step of the way, and they're not going to let him go at this point. You can also see their hand in Trump's recent claim that he was "The Chosen One."

  32. The Democrats don't impeach. They just like to talk about impeachment; for years. Sort of like the way they talked about Russian collusion; for years. The same way they complain about immigration policy, but haven't made any attempt to reform immigration law; for years. It's all just politics and fund-raising for them. They have no interest in conducting "the peoples' " business.

  33. Supreme Court Justices should be exceptional people, not susceptible to potential blackmail and pressure because of their crazy high school/college drinking binges. Oh, there is evidence, and think of the power the black-mailers would have! (Like Putin and Trump)

  34. From Australia. Without Trump, your country would be a sick, degenerate nation run by pedophile Clintons & the perverts on the left!!

  35. New President in 2020, Universal Basic Income would work ,Universal Basic Income would work, Trump Think it is the smartest but Stupid President ,make lot of enemies and has no friends in this world, he lead many farmer to bankrupt and 12000 retail store bankrup and closings, Trump not be reelected,in 2020. https://ibb.co/WVyxPTZ

    https://ibb.co/Xx4cFyc The US_ China trade war has brought Trump’s brain Influent water, and the idiot’s president helped Ren Zhengfei promote 5G free advertising, lifting stones to hit his own feet, stupid President Trump will not be re-elected 2020,. New President in 2020

  36. @NBC – How are you still in business?! Your propaganda is more blatant then what Soviets used to put out. It's 2019, yet you operate as if it '99. … You should start prepping your Chapter 13 bankruptcy papers.

  37. This is a distraction put up by Democrats. They have been disgraced and humiliated by their failed hopes on the Mueller report and their futile impeachment of efforts. Trump’s successive wins on the funding of the wall, ruling on the sanctuary issue, installation of 150 new federal judges, the blooming economy and unparalleled success on employment, etc are just too much for the Dems who have accomplished nothing but work desperately to impeach Trump. Now they’re grasping at straws trying to drag the failed Kavanaugh smear back into the picture. A distraction by the Dems, pure and simple, while they concoct other plans to get rid of Trump.

  38. Democrats were wrong about Russia, they were wrong about Kavanaugh (new York times had to walk back this story), they were wrong about jussie Smollett and many many other stories… how much fake news does it take for people to do there own research about trump, not believe what others have said about him, and watch raw unedited videos of him instead to form there opinion on him.

  39. Can't we get Comey to exonerate him? It worked for Clinton. Are these sire losers not figuring out how desperate and petty they look? Every day there is something new and if it isn't Trump it's somebody he nominated, appointed, shook hands with at a rally, or had recess with in the first grade. It is interesting to me that after everything thrown at Kavanaugh was shown not only to be unprovable, but much of it lies, they still have the nerve to take a swing at him. Before him, we strongly considered always believing the "victim". After what they tried to do to him, we will never believe them again. In fact it likely they are lying because they can, and get away with it. They have set women's rights back further than Bill Clinton, maybe Ted Kennedy. If the anti-Trumpers keep going we will be back to only male landowners being able to vote. I get their bent toward regressive socialism/communism. They're stupid, angry, and hate freedom, but that's their thing. Why do they have to force it on the rest of us? And when is the GOP going to hit back? Why do these cowards sit there and make Trump fight alone?

Related Post