Democrats Plan To Investigate Trump’s Role In Hush Money Payments | Hardball | MSNBC


>>>WELCOME BACK TO “HARDBALL.”>>>WELCOME BACK TO “HARDBALL.” DEMOCRATS ON THE HOUSE JUDICIARY DEMOCRATS ON THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ARE PLANNING TO COMMITTEE ARE PLANNING TO REFOCUS THEIR INVESTIGATIONS OF REFOCUS THEIR INVESTIGATIONS OF THE WHITE HOUSE ON THE 2016 THE WHITE HOUSE ON THE 2016 SCHEME TO SILENCE TWO WOMEN SCHEME TO SILENCE TWO WOMEN ALLEGING AFFAIRS WITH THE ALLEGING AFFAIRS WITH THE PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT. “THE WASHINGTON POST” WAS FIRST “THE WASHINGTON POST” WAS FIRST TO REPORT THAT THE COMMITTEE, TO REPORT THAT THE COMMITTEE, QUOTE, IS PREPARING TO HOLD QUOTE, IS PREPARING TO HOLD HEARINGS AND CALL WITNESSES HEARINGS AND CALL WITNESSES INVOLVED IN HUSH MONEY PAYMENT INVOLVED IN HUSH MONEY PAYMENT TO EX-“PLAYBOY” MODEL KAREN TO EX-“PLAYBOY” MODEL KAREN McDOUGAL AND ADULT FILM STAR McDOUGAL AND ADULT FILM STAR STORMY DANIELS AS SOON AS STORMY DANIELS AS SOON AS OCTOBER. OCTOBER. THOSE PAYMENTS WERE COORDINATED THOSE PAYMENTS WERE COORDINATED BY FORMER TRUMP LAWYER MICHAEL BY FORMER TRUMP LAWYER MICHAEL COHEN WHO IS CURRENTLY SERVING COHEN WHO IS CURRENTLY SERVING THREE YEARS IN PRISON FOR THREE YEARS IN PRISON FOR BREAKING CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS, BREAKING CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS, AMONG OTHER ACCUSATIONS. AMONG OTHER ACCUSATIONS. PROSECUTORS IN COHEN’S CASE PROSECUTORS IN COHEN’S CASE DETAILED THE PRESIDENT’S ALLEGED DETAILED THE PRESIDENT’S ALLEGED ROLE IN THIS SCHEME, BUT CLOSED ROLE IN THIS SCHEME, BUT CLOSED THEIR INVESTIGATION LAST MONTH THEIR INVESTIGATION LAST MONTH WITH NO ADDITIONAL CHARGES. WITH NO ADDITIONAL CHARGES. NOW ACCORDING TO THE POST, NOW ACCORDING TO THE POST, QUOTE, THE NEW CONGRESSIONAL QUOTE, THE NEW CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRY WILL REOPEN QUESTIONS INQUIRY WILL REOPEN QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EXTENT OF TRUMP’S ABOUT THE EXTENT OF TRUMP’S INVOLVEMENT IN THE EPISODE AND INVOLVEMENT IN THE EPISODE AND WHETHER HE WOULD HAVE BEEN WHETHER HE WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED IF NOT FOR JUSTICE CHARGED IF NOT FOR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OPINIONS THAT A DEPARTMENT OPINIONS THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE INDICTED. INDICTED. THE NEW LINE OF INQUIRY WILL NO THE NEW LINE OF INQUIRY WILL NO DOUBT FUEL MORE DEBATE ABOUT DOUBT FUEL MORE DEBATE ABOUT IMPEACHMENT, A MOVE THAT’S NOW IMPEACHMENT, A MOVE THAT’S NOW FAVORED BY 134 DEMOCRATS IN THE FAVORED BY 134 DEMOCRATS IN THE HOUSE. HOUSE. JOINING ME NOW IS DEMOCRATIC JOINING ME NOW IS DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSWOMAN MARY GAY SCANLON CONGRESSWOMAN MARY GAY SCANLON OF PENNSYLVANIA, THANK YOU FOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US. JOINING US. LET ME ASK YOU THIS. LET ME ASK YOU THIS. THIS WAS INVESTIGATED IN THE THIS WAS INVESTIGATED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. THE CASE WAS CLOSED WITHOUT ANY THE CASE WAS CLOSED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER ACTION. FURTHER ACTION. WHAT CAN YOU LEARN HERE? WHAT CAN YOU LEARN HERE? WHAT DO YOU HOPE TO LEARN HERE WHAT DO YOU HOPE TO LEARN HERE THAT WE DON’T ALREADY KNOW? THAT WE DON’T ALREADY KNOW?>>WELL, WHAT WE KNOW ALREADY IS>>WELL, WHAT WE KNOW ALREADY IS THAT MICHAEL COHEN IS SERVING THAT MICHAEL COHEN IS SERVING JAIL TIME FOR CAMPAIGN FINANCE JAIL TIME FOR CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS INVOLVING PAYING VIOLATIONS INVOLVING PAYING MONEY IN VIOLATION OF CAMPAIGN MONEY IN VIOLATION OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS TO AFFECT THE FINANCE LAWS TO AFFECT THE ELECTION OF HIS THEN BOSS, ELECTION OF HIS THEN BOSS, DONALD TRUMP. DONALD TRUMP. WE KNOW THAT THE SOUTHERN WE KNOW THAT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT INVESTIGATED IT. DISTRICT INVESTIGATED IT. WE KNOW THAT THE D.A. IN WE KNOW THAT THE D.A. IN MANHATTAN IS STILL INVESTIGATING MANHATTAN IS STILL INVESTIGATING IT, AND JUST RECENTLY, JUST AT IT, AND JUST RECENTLY, JUST AT THE BEGINNING OF AUGUST, ISSUED THE BEGINNING OF AUGUST, ISSUED SOME MORE SUBPOENAS. SOME MORE SUBPOENAS. SO THERE ARE ACTIVE FACTS THERE SO THERE ARE ACTIVE FACTS THERE THAT SHOULD BE LOOKED INTO. THAT SHOULD BE LOOKED INTO. I THINK IT WOULD BE MALPRACTICE I THINK IT WOULD BE MALPRACTICE OF THE JUDICIARY NOT TO LOOK OF THE JUDICIARY NOT TO LOOK INTO IS THE T PRESIDENT INTO IS THE T PRESIDENT AUTHORIZED PAYMENTS TO ANYBODY AUTHORIZED PAYMENTS TO ANYBODY TO TRY TO IMPACT HIS ELECTION. TO TRY TO IMPACT HIS ELECTION.>>I GUESS THAT’S MY QUESTION,>>I GUESS THAT’S MY QUESTION, BECAUSE I’VE SEEN SOME OF MY BECAUSE I’VE SEEN SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES. COLLEAGUES. ONE OF YOUR COLLEAGUES QUOTED ONE OF YOUR COLLEAGUES QUOTED ALREADY SATISFIED THAT THE ALREADY SATISFIED THAT THE EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT SHOWS THE EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT SHOWS THE PRESIDENT WAS A CO-CONSPIRATOR. PRESIDENT WAS A CO-CONSPIRATOR. IS THAT YOUR VIEW OR NOT? IS THAT YOUR VIEW OR NOT?>>THERE MAY BE EVIDENCE THERE,>>THERE MAY BE EVIDENCE THERE, BUT OUR COMMITTEE HASN’T SEEN BUT OUR COMMITTEE HASN’T SEEN IT. IT. CONGRESS HASN’T SEEN IT THERE CONGRESS HASN’T SEEN IT THERE WAS EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THE WAS EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THE GRAND JURY. GRAND JURY. THE U.S. ATTORNEY UP THERE THE U.S. ATTORNEY UP THERE REFERS TO SOMEONE WHO CAN ONLY REFERS TO SOMEONE WHO CAN ONLY BE THE PRESIDENT AS INDIVIDUAL BE THE PRESIDENT AS INDIVIDUAL NUMBER 1 AS HAVING AUTHORIZED NUMBER 1 AS HAVING AUTHORIZED PAYMENTS IN VIOLATION OF PAYMENTS IN VIOLATION OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS. CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS. SO IT’S KIND OF LIKE YOU CAN SO IT’S KIND OF LIKE YOU CAN CHARGE SOMEONE BASED UPON WHAT CHARGE SOMEONE BASED UPON WHAT YOU’VE BEEN TOLD, BUT YOU NEED YOU’VE BEEN TOLD, BUT YOU NEED TO SEE THE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU TO SEE THE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU GO TO TRIAL. GO TO TRIAL.>>WHO DO YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM?>>WHO DO YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM?>>YOU KNOW, I THINK WE’RE GOING>>YOU KNOW, I THINK WE’RE GOING TO HAVE TO FOLLOW THE MONEY, AS TO HAVE TO FOLLOW THE MONEY, AS THEY SAY, AND SEE WHAT IS IN THE THEY SAY, AND SEE WHAT IS IN THE FILES FROM THE SOUTHERN FILES FROM THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT. DISTRICT. THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE INVOLVED. INVOLVED. I’M MUCH MORE INTERESTED IN WHO I’M MUCH MORE INTERESTED IN WHO AUTHORIZED ANY HUSH MONEY AUTHORIZED ANY HUSH MONEY PAYMENTS THAN WHO THEY WERE PAYMENTS THAN WHO THEY WERE GIVEN TO. GIVEN TO.>>THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR QUESTION>>THE CHAIRMAN OF YOUR QUESTION COMMITTEE SAYS THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAYS THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS ALREADY ENGAGED IN COMMITTEE IS ALREADY ENGAGED IN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. THIS PART OF THAT? THIS PART OF THAT?>>I THINK IT ABSOLUTELY IS.>>I THINK IT ABSOLUTELY IS. ONE OF THE CORE FUNCTIONS OF THE ONE OF THE CORE FUNCTIONS OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS TO JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEY’RE DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEY’RE IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES. IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES. THE MUELLER REPORT WAS PART OF THE MUELLER REPORT WAS PART OF THAT, BUT THERE IS CERTAINLY A THAT, BUT THERE IS CERTAINLY A NUMBER OF OTHER ALLEGATIONS NUMBER OF OTHER ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING THIS ADMINISTRATION CONCERNING THIS ADMINISTRATION THAT COULD AMOUNT TO HIGH CRIMES THAT COULD AMOUNT TO HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. AND MISDEMEANORS.>>SO I GUESS THAT’S AN>>SO I GUESS THAT’S AN INTERESTING QUESTION THEN. INTERESTING QUESTION THEN. DO YOU BELIEVE THE QUESTION DO YOU BELIEVE THE QUESTION YOU’RE POSING HERE IS WHETHER YOU’RE POSING HERE IS WHETHER THE PRESIDENT WAS INVOLVED IN OR THE PRESIDENT WAS INVOLVED IN OR WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS THE WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS THE PRINCIPLE FIGURE IN SETTING UP PRINCIPLE FIGURE IN SETTING UP THIS SCHEME TO GO AROUND THIS SCHEME TO GO AROUND CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS TO KEEP CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS TO KEEP THE POLITICALLY EMBARRASSING THE POLITICALLY EMBARRASSING AFFAIR A SECRET DURING THE AFFAIR A SECRET DURING THE CAMPAIGN. CAMPAIGN. YOU BELIEVE IF ESTABLISHED THAT YOU BELIEVE IF ESTABLISHED THAT WOULD BE IMPEACHABLE? WOULD BE IMPEACHABLE? THAT WOULD BE A HIGH CRIME? THAT WOULD BE A HIGH CRIME?>>ABSOLUTELY.>>ABSOLUTELY. IN FACT, THE FRAMERS OF THE IN FACT, THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION, WHEN THEY DEBATED CONSTITUTION, WHEN THEY DEBATED THOSE TERMS, WHETHER OR NOT THOSE TERMS, WHETHER OR NOT THERE SHOULD BE AN IMPEACHMENT THERE SHOULD BE AN IMPEACHMENT CLAUSE RIGHT HERE IN CLAUSE RIGHT HERE IN PHILADELPHIA WHERE I’M SITTING, PHILADELPHIA WHERE I’M SITTING, THEY LAID OUT A NUMBER OF THINGS THEY LAID OUT A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT THEY VIEWED AS IMPEACHABLE THAT THEY VIEWED AS IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES. OFFENSES. ONE OF THEM WAS PROCURING ONE OF THEM WAS PROCURING ELECTION BY CORRUPTION. ELECTION BY CORRUPTION. IF THE PRESIDENT PROCURED HIS IF THE PRESIDENT PROCURED HIS ELECTION BY CORRUPTION, THEN THE ELECTION BY CORRUPTION, THEN THE FOUNDERS OF OUR COUNTRY VIEWED FOUNDERS OF OUR COUNTRY VIEWED THAT AS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE. THAT AS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.>>I GUESS THE PERIL, IF IT DOES>>I GUESS THE PERIL, IF IT DOES COME TO THIS, IF YOU HAVE THESE COME TO THIS, IF YOU HAVE THESE HEARINGS, IF IT’S PART OF AN HEARINGS, IF IT’S PART OF AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, IF THIS IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, IF THIS LEADS TO AN IMPEACHMENT LEADS TO AN IMPEACHMENT RECOMMENDATION FROM YOUR RECOMMENDATION FROM YOUR COMMITTEE, I THINK ONE OF THE COMMITTEE, I THINK ONE OF THE CRITICISMS THAT MIGHT BE LEVELED CRITICISMS THAT MIGHT BE LEVELED AGAINST TAKING THAT ACTION WOULD AGAINST TAKING THAT ACTION WOULD BE WHAT ABOUT BILL CLINTON? BE WHAT ABOUT BILL CLINTON? WHAT ABOUT DEMOCRATS LIKE JERRY WHAT ABOUT DEMOCRATS LIKE JERRY NADLER WHO CHAIRS YOUR COMMITTEE NADLER WHO CHAIRS YOUR COMMITTEE IN 1998 AND HOW THEY HANDLED IN 1998 AND HOW THEY HANDLED BILL CLINTON? BILL CLINTON? COMMITTED A FELONY, PERJURY, TO COMMITTED A FELONY, PERJURY, TO COVER UP A POLITICALLY COVER UP A POLITICALLY EMBARRASSING AFFAIR TO KEEP THE EMBARRASSING AFFAIR TO KEEP THE COUNTRY FROM KNOWING ABOUT THAT. COUNTRY FROM KNOWING ABOUT THAT. THE POSITION OF JERRY NADLER, THE POSITION OF JERRY NADLER, THE POSITION OF JUST ABOUT EVERY THE POSITION OF JUST ABOUT EVERY DEMOCRAT BACK THEN WAS, YEAH, IT DEMOCRAT BACK THEN WAS, YEAH, IT WAS A FELONY. WAS A FELONY. YEAH, IT WAS TO COVER UP YEAH, IT WAS TO COVER UP SOMETHING POLITICALLY SOMETHING POLITICALLY EMBARRASSING, MAYBE SOMETHING EMBARRASSING, MAYBE SOMETHING POLITICALLY DAMAGING, BUT IT POLITICALLY DAMAGING, BUT IT WASN’T IMPEACHABLE BECAUSE IT WASN’T IMPEACHABLE BECAUSE IT WAS PRIVATE MATTER. WAS PRIVATE MATTER.>>OKAY.>>OKAY. WELL, SO, IMPEACHMENT HAS ALWAYS WELL, SO, IMPEACHMENT HAS ALWAYS BEEN A COMBINATION OF ACTUAL BEEN A COMBINATION OF ACTUAL CONDUCT AND A POLITICAL CONDUCT AND A POLITICAL CALCULATION. CALCULATION. AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THE AMERICAN QUESTION IS WHETHER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT IT’S AN PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT IT’S AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE, AND IT’S IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE, AND IT’S OUR JOB ON JUDICIARY TO GET THE OUR JOB ON JUDICIARY TO GET THE EVIDENCE OUT THERE. EVIDENCE OUT THERE.>>I GUESS THE QUESTION I’M>>I GUESS THE QUESTION I’M ASKING IS THE LINE THAT WAS ASKING IS THE LINE THAT WAS DRAWN IN 1998 WAS YES, HE MIGHT DRAWN IN 1998 WAS YES, HE MIGHT HAVE COMMITTED A FELONY, BUT HAVE COMMITTED A FELONY, BUT BECAUSE IT WAS ABOUT SOMETHING BECAUSE IT WAS ABOUT SOMETHING THAT WAS ULTIMATELY PRIVATE, A THAT WAS ULTIMATELY PRIVATE, A CONSENSUAL AFFAIR, IT WASN’T CONSENSUAL AFFAIR, IT WASN’T IMPEACHABLE. IMPEACHABLE. NOW THERE WOULD BE A CHARGE NOW THERE WOULD BE A CHARGE POTENTIALLY, A CHARGE THAT THE POTENTIALLY, A CHARGE THAT THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED A FELONY TO PRESIDENT COMMITTED A FELONY TO COVER UP A POLITICALLY COVER UP A POLITICALLY EMBARRASSING AFFAIR, BUT IT EMBARRASSING AFFAIR, BUT IT WOULD BE IMPEACHABLE, EVEN WOULD BE IMPEACHABLE, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS PRIVATE CONSENSUAL THOUGH IT WAS PRIVATE CONSENSUAL AFFAIR. AFFAIR.>>I THINK THERE IS A LOT OF>>I THINK THERE IS A LOT OF DISTINCTIONS THERE, THE FIRST OF DISTINCTIONS THERE, THE FIRST OF WHICH WAS I WASN’T IN CONGRESS WHICH WAS I WASN’T IN CONGRESS BACK THEN. BACK THEN. BUT I THINK THE REALLY IMPORTANT BUT I THINK THE REALLY IMPORTANT ONE IS THAT THE FELONY AT ISSUE ONE IS THAT THE FELONY AT ISSUE HERE WOULD BE WHETHER OR NOT THE HERE WOULD BE WHETHER OR NOT THE PRESIDENT ACTED IN A WAY THAT PRESIDENT ACTED IN A WAY THAT WAS CORRUPT TO PROCURE HIS OWN WAS CORRUPT TO PROCURE HIS OWN ELECTION. ELECTION. IT REALLY GOES TO THE HEART OF IT REALLY GOES TO THE HEART OF OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM. OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM.>>SAY YOU’RE IN AN IMPEACHMENT>>SAY YOU’RE IN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY RIGHT NOW. INQUIRY RIGHT NOW. JERRY NADLER SAID HE PATES VOTES

Author Since: Mar 11, 2019

  1. Really, they are not stupid? Why are they still wondering- why? or worse when? will you Impeach Trump? If you are a Democrat and you are being fooled by these 2 still playing this game.Get a gun, because Trump can't and won't be impeached.If you are still lost, it is your own fault.All House members will be in the same boat as Trump in 2020.Get it.Dont write to me!

  2. More MSM INSANITY!!!!!!! So glad I woke up to the Democrat Deepstate LIE! the Dems the Bush era repubs each the same the SWAMP!

  3. I am not legally trained but this presenter needs to go back to school.. The Clinton issue had no money connections-Trump is alleged to have paid-off his accuser with campaign funds..
    Yes, you need to ask tough questions but they should be relevant, he's simply comparing apples to oranges…

  4. SOUNDS LIKE PANIC USING OLD FAKE LYING NEWS FROM 2017 DEMONRATS SO DESPERATE FOR ANYTHING BUT WILL FAIL MISERABLY ONCE AGAIN,HEY DEMONRATS U LOSE GOD WINS AND THAT CORRUPT SWAMP WILL BE DRAINED PERMANENTLY SOON RIGHT INTO GUANTANAMO BAY PRISON FOR MILITARY TRIBUNALS AND EXECUTIONS FOR TREASONOUS TRAITORS TO AMERICA.NOTHING CAN OR WILL STOP WHATS COMING NOTHING enjoy the show Lying Clowns

  5. Like Q and Trump said those who SCREAM the LOUDEST HAVE THE MOST TO LOSE,keep Screaming Democrats and fake Lying news msnbc.U LOSE

  6. The US leadership is corrupt and criminal. If trump isn't impeached and wins the election in 2020, The US is lost and is open to all criminals. The courts must let all those that are in prison out. The president, attorney general, vice president and others enabling them are all scoundrels and conmen. The US is losing world respect and will take years to get back. It's no wonder trump lost so much money in business and went bankrupt so many times. trump is a failure and a loser. His tax returns must be seen by the American public to prove he's corrupt and a liar. Although, we all know he is!

  7. This lady just said that you can charge someone from what you have been told, but you need evidence for trial.
    Seems like you might need the evidence before charging someone.

  8. Kornacky is acting like he doesn't get it that Trump is a corrupt piece of trash that is stinking up the country and needs to be taken to the curb for pick up.

  9. CNN has 3 times as many subscribers as MSNBC
    Yet, MSNBC retains the title as
    the number 1 Trump-hating Channel
    😁😁😁😁😁

  10. It’s time for some real news MSNBC.
    https://www.wnd.com/2019/09/sources-omars-husband-confirms-married-brother/

    Sources: Omar's husband confirms she was married to her own brother
    Congresswoman reportedly asking him to lie for her

  11. 40 ++ million Parriots, Veterans and Militia will soon be investigating Democrat Congress. !! FACE TO FACE !! MFERS.. !!

  12. Mr. President.. Please Declair Democrat PIG voters as enemies of America… Let the fking Party begin. !! Release and order all 40 ++ million Parriots, Veterans and Militia who took an oath to protect America from scum sucking Pigs like them. To HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE !! issue Wanted posters. For them scum sucking Pigs. Offer Big Rewards…

  13. #TRUMPSbabyBROIDYABORTION wtf! another playmate #trumpJUGWAGONstripperwagon for "titty-baby adult's are of lower IQ," LIKE TRUMP. #BONESPURSboobyBabyBOYrepublicant.

  14. Who Cares,, Oh only people that Hate the President,,..If they did not prove it before they just can't keep trying now,,they are just destroying the country…

  15. whoohoo let's start a probe again…start all-over. We have no ideas, all we say is a lie, but hey…we are Demorats so we keep at it while we can.
    stupid facks.

  16. Hush money is embarrassing but not against the law… MSNBC desperately trying to find the next FAKE NEWS story! Bwhahaha!

  17. I want a report of how many congressmen paid hush money the core mission of congress isn't to harass the president it's to enact laws

  18. What are the odds that the House will investigate Ilhan the anti-Semite Omar for her payments to her married campaign staff member after sleeping with him? Oh and he was WHITE too… VERY WHITE.. like pasty … the evidence of the adultery you ask? In his filed divorce papers. ACTUAL document. Not like a picture of a woman taking a lie detector test in a magazine aged so much it looks like it was taken from a cheap hotel in the 70's

  19. You know Dems have hit rock bottom and are wanting their extremest followers to rant one more time till it dies then they will hit rock bottom again and find something else

  20. Maybe why he🤡 only wants to give written answers to preapproved investigators ' questions. Then he doesn't get caught lying under oath. And they let him get by with the written answers. Clinton wouldn't have been allowed that loophole.

  21. It is not illegal to use personal money to shut someone up. It has to be proven that it was for the campaign to get him elected. It could have been for several other reasons. Let's say you used 5K to get the landscaping in your yard done, new paint on the house, driveway resurfaced. Then Photos were taken for the campaign flyers. Does the money used have to be reported? No, it doesn't. And it doesn't mean they were hiding the money. It was not used as a tax deduction either…………..democrats, give it up Using money for Personal reasons to shut someone up, is not anyone's business. Maybe he didn't want his wife and family to know. Prove it otherwise. Don't hold your breath on this one…..OH, and just because Cohen gave a reason,…….so what, why is he in jail? Liar

  22. Shhhhhh shhhhh let us not speak of this it is hush money the same as the MSNBC change subject Epstein money Epstein is now the official MSNBC Hillary 2020 hush word

  23. Trump out here getting into our business w opioids n health n what not, trying to RIP people off their pains meds all under the guise he cares but he cnt even care enough about his family to keep his rap in his pants. I say he take care of his crap 1st then try to care about me.

  24. Call me naive but what's the whole point? That we tear this man down by any means possible? Even if he is the head of our country right now n cnt Nothing be done about it? Or to try n help him do what's right n pray for him to make better decisions n not be at the ready to destroy him like he is a out to commit genocide or something. Forgive, move on & support good intentions n dont judge least ul be judged too. Remain blameless but be peaceful when bad does occur on accident or on purpose. Alot of people can do crap on purpose n later on regret it…they cnt take it back but they will learn from it. Be kind if u can. N dont be so quick to tear him apart. He is very vulnerable n noone likes him, how would we all feel if one nourning we turned on our radios n heard he committed suicide? Some would say great but I would say it's all our faults. He is the most bullied man in America right now. Have mercy, do what u gotta do…obey the law n move on. I kno it's hard, but u gotta do what u gotta do n who knows, u or I may look back one day n thank him for what he feels is the right thing to do for now…good luck

  25. Ha, Ha , Ha, Ha, Ha, ha, ha, Ha, Ha , Ha, Ha, Ha, ha, ha so funny ! Russian Delusion Collusion Ha, Ha , Ha, Ha, Ha, ha, ha, Ha, Ha , Ha, Ha, Ha, ha, ha so so funny ! Then you have the left wing media falling for it all !!! Ha, Ha , Ha, Ha, Ha, ha, ha, Ha, Ha , Ha, Ha, Ha, ha, ha so so funny !

  26. Trump is deteriorating so fast that there probably won't be time to finish any invesgation before he becomes incapacitated. It seems to me he has Alzheimer's or some other debilitating neurological condition.

  27. Has he been tested for syphilis? Tertiary syphilis would explain his recent behavior, and ties nicely to this story. He probably doesn't even think he cheated since Melania was (allegedly) undocumented. He'll be fully deteriorated by the time indictments begin in Jan 2021.

  28. Yeah, Cohen does Trump's dirty work after Trump had all his fun with Stormy, and look who ended up in prison. Something is wrong with that picture big time. Trump's whole life has revolved around f**king the little guy, as Cohen's imprisonment suggests, and everyone knows this, but to this day Mr. T continues to get away with murder. Which brings up the Epstein matter, doesn't it? Just another nasty "involvement" that was wrapped up nicely behind the scenes, right Mr. Barr?

  29. The corruption is so deep in Trumps Administration and others around it, judges, lawyers, Fox News, Border Patrol, IRS, SDNY, DOJ, etc. You have entity's that are with him but can't be public about it, because he's a hack President.

  30. Release it the people need to know the truth, because if a cover up is put into progress it leaders to total corruption in hiding toxic people,including people that the American people placed in trust into Goverement and positions of trust working for the American people,

  31. Meanwhile in real news Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., repeatedly violated state rules when she used campaign funds to pay for personal out-of-state travel as well as help on her tax returns and must reimburse her former campaign committee nearly $3,500, Minnesota campaign finance officials ruled Thursday.

  32. I wonder if you can be impeached for not paying your bills? All those towns still waiting to get their expenses paid from when he held his rallies and even the July 4 fiasco. All towns should demand cash up front before allowing him to hold any future rallies. Then there's the emoluments clause which he ignores right in front of their eyes. Standing with Putin against the US? What will it take?

  33. First, on what planet can’t a president who commits crimes be indicted? I’m tired of this crap. Clearly the Justice Department is corrupt. Second, I can’t stand Pelosi and her cowardly do nothing behavior. The Dem establishment was stupid to elect her Speaker of the House again when they had a chance to select fresh blood that would’ve gone after that miscreant full throttle. More Justice Democrats and more barracudas with no-holds-barred tactics and language for Trump. He’s a sociopath. He & the trash that supports him take basic manners etiquette, & decorum for weakness. It’s about time there be actual REAL political opposition that will roast Trump and his cronies over an open fire. Period.

  34. Nooo, in the Clinton case, his "crime" was lying, ONLY about that afair. That's it, and that's all. He lied once, to congress, who was only asking about that one thing, which was itself a private affair. In this case, he actually used a series of lies and orders to others to lie, to cover up more than one offense of both private and public nature for the purpose of securing the election. Remember, Clinton was NOT in danger of losing an election when those hearings took place. I think Clinton was a shitbag for what he did, but the crime he was accused of should never have been lying to congress, but ethics violations of abusing the office to gain sexual favors from a subordinate. In any case, the two cases are NOT comparable, either in kind, or in severity. It's the difference between being charged for slapping your wife, and being charged for beating her into a coma.

  35. What happened to Russia? Racism? Recession? Now it's "Recycling". I USED to vote for Dems when they were actually somewhat believable. Now they are a joke. Why don't they help get something DONE for once?

  36. SO, serial prostitutes who get away with it because they @#$3 rich dirty old johns, vs every day johns, try to shake down a candidate for consensual prostitution 10 YEARS ago, and the Dems – who have JUST as much guilt using TAX PAYER $ to pay off their own harassment and prostitution in DC – want to try to accuse Trump with these two serial slanks? Really.

  37. Covering up adulterous behavior with hush money is fine & dandy for the hilariously self-proclaimed 'family values' party. Just another 'SO WHAT' in Donny's crimefest, right, GOP? ? ?

  38. Having a girl friend of adult age and denying sexual relations was not exactly the same thing as Spending election campaign money on an ex girl friend to hush her up. President Trump has a wake of female victims he spent settlement hush money on personally in private and in business. . Including hush up divorce money,. A wake of victims larger than the wake from his yaught.!!! So; as far as not being moral there is no law against that but there is a law against all his business practices to profit from his deals with Israel, and the Saudi's, and NRA and Real estate ventures and Trump- Towers, and money laundering banks. There are laws against campaign finance violations. He is very guilty of being suspected of being an anti human psychopath, and dishonest criminal only the supporters do not see him as a greedy predator, and charlatan, or parasite conning them yet? Which is in itself a great mystery . S0; generally they feel its only Democrats after him and his nasty lying oval office and dictatorial takeover of our nation, not wiser human beings in his nation, seeing a lawless president talk about getting harder on crime..

  39. Here's a Headline Trump can look forward to.. and this is definitely not fake news and it want be in Trumps case either. For some reason Trump thinks he's in office forever and want be held accountable for the things he's doing.
    Former first lady of Honduras sentenced to 58 years in jail
    TEGUCIGALPA (Reuters) – The former first lady of Honduras Rosa Elena Bonilla, wife of ex-president Porfirio Lobo, was sentenced on Wednesday to 58 years in jail on charges of fraud and undue appropriation of funds, a spokesman for the nation's highest court said.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/former-first-lady-of-honduras-sentenced-to-58-years-in-jail/ar-AAGOFbI?li=BBnb7Kz

  40. Baffled by the argument that trump shouldn't be impeached because Dems didn't want to impeach Clinton. Clinton got impeached. If you want precedent, great, but that may not be the precedent you're trying for.

  41. Americans intend to investigate the role the democrats have played in protecting pedophile’s and the state department covering it up under Hillary Clinton…. just so you all know You are voting for evil people!!!!

Related Post